Visible to the public A Measurement Study on Linux Container Security: Attacks and Countermeasures

TitleA Measurement Study on Linux Container Security: Attacks and Countermeasures
Publication TypeConference Paper
Year of Publication2018
AuthorsLin, Xin, Lei, Lingguang, Wang, Yuewu, Jing, Jiwu, Sun, Kun, Zhou, Quan
Conference NameProceedings of the 34th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference
Conference LocationNew York, NY, USA
ISBN Number978-1-4503-6569-7
Keywordscontainer, Kernel Security Mechanisms, privilege escalation, pubcrawl, resilience, Resiliency, Scalability, Security by Default

Linux container mechanism has attracted a lot of attention and is increasingly utilized to deploy industry applications. Though it is a consensus that the container mechanism is not secure due to the kernel-sharing property, it lacks a concrete and systematical evaluation on its security using real world exploits. In this paper, we collect an attack dataset including 223 exploits that are effective on the container platform, and classify them into different categories using a two-dimensional attack taxonomy. Then we evaluate the security of existing Linux container mechanism using 88 typical exploits filtered out from the dataset. We find 50 (56.82%) exploits can successfully launch attacks from inside the container with the default configuration. Since the privilege escalation exploits can completely disable the container protection mechanism, we conduct an in-depth analysis on these exploits. We find the kernel security mechanisms such as Capability, Seccomp, and MAC play a more important role in preventing privilege escalation than the container isolation mechanisms (i.e., Namespace and Cgroup). However, the interdependence and mutual-influence relationship among these kernel security mechanisms may make them fall into the "short board effect" and impair their protection capability. By studying the 11 exploits that still can successfully break the isolation provided by container and achieve privilege escalation, we identify a common 4-step attack model followed by all 11 exploits. Finally, we propose a defense mechanism to effectively defeat those identified privilege escalation attacks.

Citation Keylin_measurement_2018